Adolescents should be a particular target group of reproductive and sexual health programmes. This is due to their vulnerability to health risks associated with unsafe sexual activity: early pregnancies, STIs; as well as their encountering of numerous obstacles in exercising their reproductive rights; for example in access to services and information on family planning. However, in countries of Central and Eastern Europe, there is no sufficient attention given to adolescents’ reproductive health needs. Specialised services for young people are very rare, if any. Service providers often present bias towards adolescents accessing reproductive health services. Anecdotal data shows that there are many cases where providers refuse to prescribe contraceptives or to counsel young people on contraceptive options. Many providers assume a paternalistic attitude towards youth and do not observe confidentiality. Another serious problem is the lack of comprehensive and widely available sexual education for young people. Sex education is not provided at schools on systematic basis. Curricula on sex education do not give adequate attention to topics of birth control, contraception and protection from STIs as well as the promotion of safe sex practices and equitable gender relations. Teachers frequently do not have adequate training in this field.4 Manuals present stereotypical attitudes to human sexuality and gender roles. The result is a low awareness on issues of protection against STIs and unwanted pregnancies among youth. As a consequence, the CEE region experiences high levels of unwanted pregnancies and large prevalence of STIs, including AIDS, among adolescents. Vulnerability of young people to contracting STIs is heightened due to the increasing number of young people, who do not complete secondary education and cannot find employment, and thus, are prone to joining special risk groups: drug addicts or sex workers.
EXAMPLE OF GOOD PRACTICE In Lithuania, on the initiative of an NGO – Family Planning and Sexual Health Association of Lithuania – five youth health centres were opened in 1998, where young people provided reproductive health consultations to their peers.12 Such initiatives, however, are still limited in scope and often unsustainable without the government commitment.
REFERENCES: 1 “Cairo Plus Five”, supra note 13, par. 73 (a). 2 “Cairo Programme of Action”, supra note 1, par. 7.3. 3 “Cairo Plus Five”, supra note 13, par. 73 (e). 4 UNICEF (1999), “Women in Transition”, supra note 7, p. 143. 5 The CRLP and Open Dialogue for Reproductive Rights (ODRR) “Reproductive Rights of Young Girls and Adolescents in Russia. A shadow report” September 1999, p. 6. 6 V. Moshin et al., ”Abortion in Moldova” in Choices Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Europe, vol. 28, No. 2, Autumn 2000, p. 24. 7 K. Sedlecki, “Sexual activity among young people is on the rise in Serbia” in Entre Nous No. 52 – 2002, p. 4. 8 S. Jejeebhoy, ”Filling the gaps in what we know” in Entre Nous No. 50 – 2001, p. 9. 9 E. Ketting et al., ”Being young and in love in Russia” in Entre Nous No. 52 – 2002, p. 12. 10 FWFP, “The Anti-abortion Law in Poland”, supra note 20, p. 27-29. 11 CRLP, “Women of the World”, supra note 10, p. 26. 12 See id. at p. 94 and 193.
|